Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 00:21:14 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Please note that upstream recently fixed a segfault bug[2] and when the
> > former bug[1] will be fixed, I'll ask for its freeze exception as well.
> >
> Is
Hi Laszlo,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 00:21:14 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Please note that upstream recently fixed a segfault bug[2] and when the
> former bug[1] will be fixed, I'll ask for its freeze exception as well.
>
Is there any chance of that happening this week? We're getting packa
Hi Salvatore,
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 23:30 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Are there plans to the 3.7.2 to be in squeeze?
Definitely. Version 3.7.2 fixes a database corruption, v3.7.1 fixes a
regression issue and v3.7.0.1 fixes another database corruption.
Thus hereby I ask the release team t
Hi Laszlo
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
> >
> > If we go that way, we will have to rebu
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
>
> If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
I think we should run forward and ship the upcoming v3
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
> >
>
> If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
>
> [1] http://release.debian.org/tran
On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid.
>
If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones).
[1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/Sqlite3.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:49:49 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> While it would be good to have 3.7.0.1-1 in testing, it's still not
> suitable to release because of the latter problem. What should I do? I
> don't have package version 3.6.23.1-4 anymore and I don't know when this
> bug will be
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:49:49PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
> There's a problem with SQLite3 3.7.0 in Squeeze.
> The version in testing (3.6.23.1-4) was suitable to release. Next major
> upstream version (3.7.0) was released, which was uploaded to unstable.
> Then free
Hi,
Laszlo Boszormenyi writes:
> There's a problem with SQLite3 3.7.0 in Squeeze.
> The version in testing (3.6.23.1-4) was suitable to release. Next major
> upstream version (3.7.0) was released, which was uploaded to unstable.
> Then freeze happened. The latest release came with problems, like
On 08/17/2010 07:49 PM, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
>
> I don't have package version 3.6.23.1-4 anymore.
>
Out of curiosity, don't use a $VCS to maintain the source package?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:49:49PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> While it would be good to have 3.7.0.1-1 in testing, it's still not
> suitable to release because of the latter problem. What should I do? I
> don't have package version 3.6.23.1-4 anymore and I don't know when this
> bug will be
Hi Release Team,
There's a problem with SQLite3 3.7.0 in Squeeze.
The version in testing (3.6.23.1-4) was suitable to release. Next major
upstream version (3.7.0) was released, which was uploaded to unstable.
Then freeze happened. The latest release came with problems, like slow
song change with B
13 matches
Mail list logo
