On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:52 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > So far as I can see, the possible options are:
> >
> > - release without ndoutils after all
> > - get the kfreebsd-* ndoutils packages removed from unstable
> > - use the largest hammer britney has to force the packages in regardless,
>
Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Tuesday, den 25. January 2011:
> On Sat, January 15, 2011 09:52, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Saturday, den 15. January 2011:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >> > Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13
On Sat, January 15, 2011 09:52, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Saturday, den 15. January 2011:
>
>> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> > Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100
>> > >
Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Saturday, den 15. January 2011:
> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011:
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100
> > > Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > Any new about the NMU?
> [...
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100
> > Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Any new about the NMU?
[...]
> > The source package's URL (ready for `dget`) is [1].
> >
> > 1. http
Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100
> Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
> > > > > Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I
> > > > > think that would be cool if the script performing removals
> > > > > would also send a me
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I
> > > > think that would be cool if the script performing removals
> > > > would also send a message to the n...@bugs.debian.org so that
> > > > the persons subscribed to i
Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Monday, den 10. January 2011:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:39:17 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> > > Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I think that
> > > would be coo
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:39:17 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> > Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I think that
> > would be cool if the script performing removals would also send a
> > message to the
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 15:39:17 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Hmm, well, this does not strictly relate to this bug, but I think that
> would be cool if the script performing removals would also send a
> message to the n...@bugs.debian.org so that the persons subscribed to it
> were set awa
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:18:49PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:52 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> > I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> > maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> > needed as othe
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 16:52 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
fwiw, it was alre
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 03:07:56PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Sunday, den 09. January 2011:
>> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
>> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
>> needed as otherwise
Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Sunday, den 09. January 2011:
> I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
> maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
> needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
>
> Could anyone
I have prepared a patch to close an RC bug [1] and pinged the package's
maintainer about this. He did not respond, so it looks like an NMU is
needed as otherwise the package will have to be removed from Squeeze.
Could anyone from the release team please review the patch [2] and
decide whether it's
15 matches
Mail list logo
