Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-02-04 Thread Thomas Weber
Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Thomas Weber: > Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can > try to get this fixed. Okay, I see Luk has already unblock octave-symbolic/1.0.6-3 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-02-02 Thread Thomas Weber
Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can try to get this fixed. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned o

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:37:32PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > > Sadly, the package now

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > > > Sigh,

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > Sigh, back to square

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > Sadly, the package now FTBFS on ARM only, > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin > Sigh, back to square one. Okay, CC'ing the arm buildd maintainers to see if the re

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-24 Thread Thomas Weber
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:27:59 +0100]: > > > Hi, > > > #512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those > > two releases is in the bug report, > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=3

Re: Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Weber [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:27:59 +0100]: > Hi, > #512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those > two releases is in the bug report, > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename=1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2;att=1;bug=512075 > There are only two actual

Question about fixing #512075

2009-01-17 Thread Thomas Weber
Hi, #512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those two releases is in the bug report, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename=1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2;att=1;bug=512075 There are only two actual changes in there, the biggest part of the diff is the newly