Matthias Klose (09/05/2012):
> transition exiv2
> 667275 merkaartor
Thankfully we managed to deal with exiv2 without a fix for it…
> transition gdal
> 667275 merkaartor
but it needs a fix right now. Forcing 4.6 on it doesn't work, and gdal
is going on. Boost looks like it needs a fix:
http://
> transition apt
> 672080 apt-watch
> 672032 debtags
> 667317 oval-interpreter
>
> transition gdal
> 671991 grass
>
> transition mysqlclient
> 671999 boinc
> 671991 grass
> 667321 pdns
>
> transition xorg
> 672056 xf86-video-glamo
these are now uploaded to delayed/2 or directly where I did find
On 05/09/2012 10:52 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 10:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 22:02 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> transition exiv2
>>> 667229 koffice
>>> 667275 merkaartor
>>>
>>> transition gdal
>>> 671991 grass
>>> 667275 merkaartor
>>
>> The exiv2 tran
On 05/09/2012 10:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 22:02 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> transition exiv2
>> 667229 koffice
>> 667275 merkaartor
>>
>> transition gdal
>> 671991 grass
>> 667275 merkaartor
>
> The exiv2 transition is much farther along than gdal and forcing them
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 22:02 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> transition exiv2
> 667229 koffice
> 667275 merkaartor
>
> transition gdal
> 671991 grass
> 667275 merkaartor
The exiv2 transition is much farther along than gdal and forcing them to
get tied together now would be A Bad Thing[tm]. So I'd
This is a list based on
http://release.debian.org/transitions/export/packages.yaml
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
looking for issues in ongoing transitions. Adam Barret suggested for transitions
that aren't boost or libtiff-symbols,
Hi all,
i was amazed to discover that the whole KDE SC 4.7 transition into unstable
requested the 1st of Jan 2012 is blocked by (the opencv transition which
was itself requested/started on July 2011, itself blocked by) a few
completely "minor" packages like
mrpt-libs scilab-sivp freej gmic f
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:20:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Are there bugs about these regressions? Have the hppa porters been
> informed about these regressions?
There are currently no bug reports about the regressions. Carlos is
aware of them and is working on them. Maybe he can
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>From a first look there are these things:
>> - stop accepting new transitions and (help to) coordinate the
>> outstanding ones
> As explained on to the release team back in August, we really want to
> see eglibc
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:36:20PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> I'm back from vacation.
>
> I would like to make sure we focus on the priorities to get Squeeze out.
>
> >From a first look there are these things:
>
> - stop accepting new transiti
Hi
I'm back from vacation.
I would like to make sure we focus on the priorities to get Squeeze out.
>From a first look there are these things:
- stop accepting new transitions and (help to) coordinate the
outstanding ones
- focus on RC bug handling by coordinating the organisation o
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100228 16:15]:
> (To see the order I would propose add -OCWn to list=needs-build, which
> means calculated order, waiting days, name.)
Some more news: This change had broken the export of entries with
non-english last change fields, which buildds e.g. in th
Hi,
I just multiplied all build-priorities with 100. Reason behind that is
that there is an patch that will add different priorities. So please
replace any usage of "1" with "100" etc. (Of course, you could use
more fine-granular dependencies as well - feel free to do that. Bu
Well, it looks like the following are the priorities:
- get cd auto-detection working if possible -- can we re-use the
code for the "warn if there's a CD in the drive when rebooting" ?
bug#123948
- install from harddisk/mounted madness, bug#123926
- dbootstrap fix
, but there are
also some surprises: On some architectures there are required packages
that conflict at each other.
ftp.debian.org maintainers: Only the consistency of packages of
standard or higher priorities are checked here. I think we should be
able to fix this since there are not many of
15 matches
Mail list logo
