Re: Possible liblapack transition

2009-03-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:41:54 +0100]: > * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-03-09 16:49]: > > If no objections are raised in a reasonable amount of time from now, I will > > release liblapack3gf_3.2.0 to unstable without bumping the SONAME. I’m sorry this went unanswered. What you did

Re: Possible liblapack transition

2009-03-14 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-03-09 16:49]: > If no objections are raised in a reasonable amount of time from now, I will > release liblapack3gf_3.2.0 to unstable without bumping the SONAME. Done. Hopefully nothing will break. Cheers, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-req

Re: Possible liblapack transition

2009-03-09 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-03-01 13:58]: > Version 3.2 of the lapack library has been released [1] and is now packaged > in experimental (version 3.2.0-1). As regards the version currently in > unstable (3.1.1), the API has changed [2] in the following way: > > [snip] > > I would like to know th

Possible liblapack transition

2009-03-01 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Version 3.2 of the lapack library has been released [1] and is now packaged in experimental (version 3.2.0-1). As regards the version currently in unstable (3.1.1), the API has changed [2] in the following way: * removed routines: DLAZQ3, DLAZQ4, SLAQZ3, and SLAQZ4 * changed interface (8 n