On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:33:59AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'm not sure why there'd be any repackaging needed? aiui no files have
> been removed, the license information contained in them has simply been
> updated.
correct. so if you want to update the "old" package to the newly
licensed d
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 23:28 +, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> a) repackage the source (a bit messsy), upload to TPU.
I'm not sure why there'd be any repackaging needed? aiui no files have
been removed, the license information contained in them has simply been
updated.
> b) it was suggested that this
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:41:02PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> There are classes of bugs that are ignored by us if they're fixed in
> unstable, copyright clarifications are among them.
exactly what I was after :) please le me know if we can apply that
logic, a simple wheezy-ignore, here. if not,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:50:34PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Users should not have to upgrade stable to new testing (Jessie) to fix
> RC bugs which could have been fixed in stable. Nor should users be
> expected to inspect details of the package in versions outside stable
> to make decisions on
On Thu, January 17, 2013 23:50, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:51:13 +
> Robert Lemmen wrote:
>
>> #695716 is a GFDL-bug, upstream has relicensed their docs and released a
>> new version 0.6.7, I have updated the package and uploaded to unstable.
>
> ... which won't get into tes
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:50:34PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Why couldn't an upload of cgdb 0.6.6-3 have been made with only the
> changes to the docs licensing?
this is a source package problem, so it would have to be a
0.6.6+dfsg1-1 with repackaged source.
> Would have been easier if you'
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:51:13 +
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> #695716 is a GFDL-bug, upstream has relicensed their docs and released a
> new version 0.6.7, I have updated the package and uploaded to unstable.
... which won't get into testing.
> unfortunately, the new version also contains other ch
#695716 is a GFDL-bug, upstream has relicensed their docs and released a
new version 0.6.7, I have updated the package and uploaded to unstable.
unfortunately, the new version also contains other changes, so I don't
think 0.6.7 can progress to testing.
I was hoping we could wheezy-ignore this b
8 matches
Mail list logo
