Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette :
>> Hi,
>>
>> atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the
>> moment. Would it be possible to unblock it?
>>
>> BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the
>> rules for udeb migration could be
2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette :
> Hi,
>
> atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the
> moment. Would it be possible to unblock it?
>
> BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the
> rules for udeb migration could be relaxed for a while, given the
>
Hi,
atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the
moment. Would it be possible to unblock it?
BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the
rules for udeb migration could be relaxed for a while, given the
expected amount of updates.
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> atk1.0 1.12.4-1 was just accepted with urgency medium in unstable; it
> only bears translation updates. Please review and hint the new
> upstream release.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #79:
Look, buddy: Windows 3.1 IS A General Protection Fault.
pgp2eEO
On Friday 05 January 2007 16:26, Loïc Minier wrote:
> atk1.0 1.12.4-1 was just accepted with urgency medium in unstable; it
> only bears translation updates. Please review and hint the new
> upstream release.
>
> atk1.0 has an udeb.
No objections.
pgpq791Xfg68G.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
Hi,
atk1.0 1.12.4-1 was just accepted with urgency medium in unstable; it
only bears translation updates. Please review and hint the new
upstream release.
atk1.0 has an udeb.
Thanks in advance,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
6 matches
Mail list logo