On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:25:39PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> I did not feel confortable asking for removal because the package
> still has a not-so-low popcount (~145 installed, ~40 vote).
>
However, since it was last uploaded two years ago and is unmaintained
upstream for over
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:50:41PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Package zinf:
> >
> > * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> > * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> > * According t
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 19:50]:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Package zinf:
> >
> > * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> > * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> > * According to RFA, it i
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Package zinf:
>
> * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> * According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
> * Is rc-buggy: http:/
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 19:45]:
> Package zinf:
>
> * Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
> * Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
> * According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
> * Is rc-buggy: http://bugs.debia
Package zinf:
* Had last maintainer upload 2 years ago.
* Has been RFAd for over a year. http://bugs.debian.org/328956
* According to RFA, it is unmaintained upstream and has alternatives.
* Is rc-buggy: http://bugs.debian.org/397032
Thus, I believe it should be removed from etch.
Please cc: I'm
6 matches
Mail list logo
