Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:31 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Surely it would be more efficient to do a maintainer upload fixing RC
> bug #690148, and you'll get the rebuilds for free?
>
> I started looking at this bug yesterday, the fix is easy but I did not
> have time to check
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:13:58 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:33:16AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Stephen Kitt (14/10/2012):
> > > Now that gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12 is installed in unstable on all
> > > architectures, would it be possible to give gcc-mingw-w64 back on
> > > a
On 2012-10-15 14:13, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:33:16AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Stephen Kitt (14/10/2012):
> Now that gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12 is installed in unstable on all
> architectures, would it be possible to give gcc-mingw-w64 back on
> all buildds? This will cause it
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:33:16AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Stephen Kitt (14/10/2012):
> > Now that gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12 is installed in unstable on all
> > architectures, would it be possible to give gcc-mingw-w64 back on
> > all buildds? This will cause it to be rebuilt using gcc-4.6
> > 4.6.
4 matches
Mail list logo