Re: Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x

2012-07-20 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:20:24 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > ISTR other segfaults in other dpkg code paths on s390x (maybe I'm just > > misremembering), if that's the case that might hint at a deeper > > problem in the architecture,

Re: Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x

2012-07-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > ISTR other segfaults in other dpkg code paths on s390x (maybe I'm just > misremembering), if that's the case that might hint at a deeper > problem in the architecture, hardware, kernel, glibc, etc? You'd be surprised, however, about

Re: Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x

2012-07-20 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 13:37:05 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x > > The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package > creation phase: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died > from sign

Re: Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x

2012-07-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:37:05PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x > > The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package > creation phase: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died > from

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x

2012-07-20 Thread Damyan Ivanov
wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package creation phase: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died from signal 11 [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&a