Re: Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:37:06PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > Joey Hess schrieb am Tuesday, den 10. May 2005: > > Micah Anderson wrote: > > > I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a > > > patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. > > > > > > The version

Re: Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-13 Thread Micah Anderson
Joey Hess schrieb am Tuesday, den 10. May 2005: > Micah Anderson wrote: > > I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a > > patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. > > > > The version uploaded to unstable (1.6.5-2.1) contains the fix for the > > security hole

Re: Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-10 Thread Joey Hess
Micah Anderson wrote: > I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a > patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. > > The version uploaded to unstable (1.6.5-2.1) contains the fix for the > security hole, two fixes for lintian errors (not warnings) and three > doc

Please consider syslog-ng for testing

2005-05-09 Thread Micah Anderson
syslog-ng has a security hole in 1.6.5-2 as noted on http://newraff.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html I've just backported the fix that appeared in 1.6.6 and was sent as a patch to the debian bug by the upstream maintainer. The version uploaded to unstable (1.6.5-2.1) contains the fix for t