Re: Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:31:27PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be > > > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced be

Re: Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-24 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be > > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1 > > (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is s

Re: Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Norbert, On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1 > (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in > incoming)

Re: Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-17 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1 > (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in > incoming). I just uploaded 4.74.dfsg.2-1 which has some more

Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-14 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1 (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in incoming). Full changelog: lsof (4.74.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=high * Removed non-free "un