On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:31:27PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
> > > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced be
* Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
> > released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1
> > (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is s
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:48:31AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
> released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1
> (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in
> incoming)
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
> released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1
> (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in
> incoming).
I just uploaded 4.74.dfsg.2-1 which has some more
The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1
(which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in
incoming).
Full changelog:
lsof (4.74.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=high
* Removed non-free "un
5 matches
Mail list logo