Re: Please allow python-coverage_3.2-1 into Squeeze

2010-08-10 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I'm not a member of the Release Team.) * Ben Finney , 2010-08-10, 11:48: Please allow the ‘python-coverage’ package version 3.2-1 into Squeeze. With regard to the package waiting in NEW, this is because the waiting version builds a debug symbols package, ‘python-coverage-dbg’, which was not p

Re: Please allow python-coverage_3.2-1 into Squeeze

2010-08-09 Thread Ben Finney
On 09-Aug-2010, Ben Finney wrote: > Please allow the ‘python-coverage’ package version 3.2-1 into Squeeze. With regard to the package waiting in NEW, this is because the waiting version builds a debug symbols package, ‘python-coverage-dbg’, which was not present in the existing ‘python-coverage’ v

Re: Please allow python-coverage_3.2-1 into Squeeze

2010-08-08 Thread Ben Finney
On 08-Aug-2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 08:11:12 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Please allow the ‘python-coverage’ package version 3.2-1 into […] > > The other changes are, I believe, non-invasive for Squeeze. > > > The package is in NEW. That doesn't sound "non-invasive".

Re: Please allow python-coverage_3.2-1 into Squeeze

2010-08-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 08:11:12 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Howdy release team, > > Please allow the ‘python-coverage’ package version 3.2-1 into Squeeze. > The existing version (2.85-1) is far behind upstream, and most users > would not find it useful any more. > > More importantly, version 3.2

Please allow python-coverage_3.2-1 into Squeeze

2010-08-08 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy release team, Please allow the ‘python-coverage’ package version 3.2-1 into Squeeze. The existing version (2.85-1) is far behind upstream, and most users would not find it useful any more. More importantly, version 3.2-1 improves the package for one of the Squeeze release goals: On 08-Aug-