> I don't see that there is any real urgency with this.
> I plan to review all packages that have udebs and have newer versions in
> sid after RC1 has been safely announced and ask for hints where needed. I
> think iso-codes can wait for that.
OK with that plan. The only "urgency" for iso-cod
On Saturday 11 November 2006 11:36, Christian Perrier wrote:
> iso-codes features a few l10n updates to ISO-3166. The package is
> currently blocked because it provides a udeb but the content of that
> udeb will not change and therefore, allowing the package to testing
> does not affect D-I.
I don
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> iso-codes features a few l10n updates to ISO-3166. The package is
> currently blocked because it provides a udeb but the content of that
> udeb will not change and therefore, allowing the package to testing
> does not affect D-I.
Has there been any
iso-codes features a few l10n updates to ISO-3166. The package is
currently blocked because it provides a udeb but the content of that
udeb will not change and therefore, allowing the package to testing
does not affect D-I.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo