Re: Please allow backupninja into testing

2005-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:32:23AM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > On Sat, 07 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > > What is the intent behind this undocumented change in the package? > > --- backupninja-0.5.orig/etc/cron.d/backupninja > > +++ backupninja-0.5/etc/cron.d/backupninja > > @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@

Re: Please allow backupninja into testing

2005-05-07 Thread Micah Anderson
On Sat, 07 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Micah, > > What is the intent behind this undocumented change in the package? > > --- backupninja-0.5.orig/etc/cron.d/backupninja > +++ backupninja-0.5/etc/cron.d/backupninja > @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/s

Re: Please allow backupninja into testing

2005-05-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Micah, On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:44:14PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > I've just uploaded a fix to unstable for important bug #307620 in > package backupninja. It satisfies all the criteria outlined in the most > recent Release Update email which outlines what can move into testing: > > Vers

Please allow backupninja into testing

2005-05-06 Thread Micah Anderson
I've just uploaded a fix to unstable for important bug #307620 in package backupninja. It satisfies all the criteria outlined in the most recent Release Update email which outlines what can move into testing: Version is the same between testing and unstable. Changes are not significant (only a han