Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-09-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 21:58:04 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:58:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > These two are the main part of what constitutes 3.5.11-2 currently in > > unstable. It would probably make sense for you to start reviewing it, so > > that further steps ge

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-09-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:58:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > These two are the main part of what constitutes 3.5.11-2 currently in > unstable. It would probably make sense for you to start reviewing it, so > that further steps get easier to review. I'm attaching a detailed > analysis of the chang

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-17 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > - Possibly remove the libmozillainterfaces-java package. It is > apparently unused, not really maintained upstream (it's even being > removed from current trunk, in favor of a separate repository if a > maintainer shows up),

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:23:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, August 12, 2010 06:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> - Iceweasel and xulrunner are currently two separate source packages, > >> sharing the exact same tarball. It is

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, August 12, 2010 06:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: >> - Iceweasel and xulrunner are currently two separate source packages, >> sharing the exact same tarball. It is the result of the packages >> history, and it would be better if they w

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:32:54AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > - Possibly remove the libmozillainterfaces-java package. It is > > apparently unused, not really maintained upstream (it's even being > > removed from current trunk, in favor of a separate repository if a > > maintainer shows

Re: Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Apologies for taking a little while to get back to you about this. On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 16:06 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Anyways, the mozilla packages I take care of > are in a releasable shape already, but there are more changes that I was > planning to do some time this month, or at leas

Planned changes to iceweasel/iceape vs. freeze

2010-08-09 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I don't remember where I got this idea that the freeze was expected to happen somewhen late this month, but I was taken by surprise by the freeze happening already. Anyways, the mozilla packages I take care of are in a releasable shape already, but there are more changes that I was planning to