Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-12-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:33 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: [it = libxslt 1.1.18-3] > So... it seems that it migrated to testing... otoh: > > $ rmadison libxslt > libxslt | 1.0.16-0.2 | oldstable | source > libxslt | 1.1.12-8 |stable | source > libxslt | 1.1.18-1 | testing | sour

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-12-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:21:38PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:32:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:40:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt,

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-12-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:11:04AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 09:07]: > > rubrica depends on python2.3-libxslt which doesn't exist from 1.1.17-2, > > released in July (and migrated to testing the same month)... > > I don't understand

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:32:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:40:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt, which is only a > > bugfix released: > > > Upstream changelog reads as follows: > > - en

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:40:02AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt, which is only a > bugfix released: > Upstream changelog reads as follows: > - entities within attributes (William Brack) > - Python detection problem (Joseph Sacco) > - in-scope

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 09:07]: > rubrica depends on python2.3-libxslt which doesn't exist from 1.1.17-2, > released in July (and migrated to testing the same month)... > I don't understand how rubrica is preventing 1.1.18-3 to propagate while > 1.1.18-1 went in without a problem

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:55:22AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 08:40]: > > All of which, except the python detection problem, have already been > > applied to 1.1.18-2 and -3... which means there won't be an shlib bump. > > I think it

Re: Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 08:40]: > All of which, except the python detection problem, have already been > applied to 1.1.18-2 and -3... which means there won't be an shlib bump. > I think it's better to have 1.1.19 in etch than an 1.1.19-looking > 1.1.18 for user understanding. On

Permission to upload libxslt 1.1.19

2006-11-29 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I'd like to upload a new upstream version of libxslt, which is only a bugfix released: Upstream changelog reads as follows: - entities within attributes (William Brack) - Python detection problem (Joseph Sacco) - in-scope namespace bug (Mike Hommey) - Result value tree caching bug (Willia