Re: Packages which may need new uploads after versioned libssl0.9.8

2005-10-16 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Hmm, a list of binary packages would probably be more useful for purposes of checking out what warrants a rebuild. OK, I'll work on it. :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packages which may need new uploads after versioned libssl0.9.8

2005-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:30:28PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Please note that libssl0.9.7 and libssl0.9.8 have a different > > SONAME. There can only be a problem when a program (indirectly) > > links to both of them. In that case, there isn't even an option >

Packages which may need new uploads after versioned libssl0.9.8

2005-10-15 Thread Nathanael Nerode
The following packages appear to have been built against openssl 0.9.8 without versioned symbols, and libraries or programs from them will accordingly misbehave if libssl0.9.7 ever ends up linked into the same program as one of them: crypt-ssleay curl newpki-lib sqlrelay cogito fireflier nag