Re: Packages to remove for libpng

2005-10-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:25:42PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > So bin-NMUs are appropriate for packages which are waiting for new libpng > and which are blocking something else. Pity I can't do them yet. :-) But if you know of such dependencies blocking something, you can tell this list ab

Re: Packages to remove for libpng

2005-10-16 Thread Nathanael Nerode
vorlon wrote: This is better fixed by reuploading the packages currently blocked on libpng, such that they get built with a libpng that doesn't require bumped shlibs. Oh ah. I somehow hadn't quite figured out that rebuilds against the new libpng would *downgrade* the dependency, although it

Re: Packages to remove for libpng

2005-10-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:03:48PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > For libpng. I think this is all that's needed. gdk-pixbuf can't > go in in advance of libpng because it has a too-high versioned dependency > on some architectures. This is better fixed by reuploading the packages currently bloc

Packages to remove for libpng

2005-10-15 Thread Nathanael Nerode
For libpng. I think this is all that's needed. gdk-pixbuf can't go in in advance of libpng because it has a too-high versioned dependency on some architectures. Anyway, it should give good output. # 207756, 328338, 331082 remove amaya/9.5-1 # dillo's tied up with openssl remove dillo/0.8.3-1.1