As someone with a PITA package that's frequently dealing every month
with strange issues on lightly-used architectures, I'd support a Tier
II system for i386/armel/etc. However, at the risk of making this
overly complex - I would prefer to see a bit more granularity on a
per-package or per-prio
Paul Gevers wrote on 08/09/2022 at 22:35:35+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 9C5C99EB05BD750A created at
> 2022-09-08T22:35:35+0200 using RSA]]
> Hi,
>
> On 08-09-2022 22:14, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> Would tier II be exclusively composed of builders that are currently
>> suppor
Hi,
On 08-09-2022 22:14, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Would tier II be exclusively composed of builders that are currently
supported by DSA?
My current proposal is ONLY about splitting the current release
architectures. And for the future, my idea for tier II (or Best Effort)
would indeed be
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote on 08/09/2022 at 13:00:11+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 9C5C99EB05BD750A created at
> 2022-09-08T13:00:11+0200 using RSA]]
> Hi all,
>
> On 01-09-2022 14:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Of course there are details to figure out and agree on, but before
>> diving in
Hi,
On 08-09-2022 13:59, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
So, maybe my main question is: if we don't consider issues on these
semi-supported architectures RC but they have a testing equivalent, why
don't the other ports architectures get the same treatment?
Fair question. One big reason is that the s
On 2022-09-08 13:00:11 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01-09-2022 14:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Of course there are details to figure out and agree on, but before
> > diving into those I'd like to hear if you are open to support the idea
> > (hopefully even in time for bookworm) or if t
Hi all,
On 01-09-2022 14:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
Of course there are details to figure out and agree on, but before
diving into those I'd like to hear if you are open to support the idea
(hopefully even in time for bookworm) or if there are already deep
concerns (that would take long to resolve
Dear DSA, ftp-master, release team,
As you are probably aware, architecture qualification is a notorious
hard problem for the Release Team and the project. This year at DebConf,
we have been discussing [1,2] a potential change in the way we look at
the (release) architectures. Although my orig
8 matches
Mail list logo
