On Thu, 20 Aug 09 19:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 16.08.2009 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >.0s should be avoided for Debian stable, the are almost always full of
> >bad bugs/regressions, as we see e.g. in 3.1.0, too.
>
> So this would mean, that squeeze will release with 3.1.x (3.1.0
> release
On 16.08.2009 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two
years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
flaky?
The next two years f
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should
> > those
> > happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
>
> I am not aware of any, but you never know with Sun. (The last one was with
> OOo
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> * Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two
> years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit
> flaky?
The next two years from now?
OOo 3.2.0 (planned End of Noiv. 2
Heya,
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be
possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
