On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 09:18 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:03 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> >> On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:44 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrot
On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:03 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
>> On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:44 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>>> + # TODO: Now we are doing something that
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:03 +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:44 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
> > + # TODO: Now we are doing something that is not allowed by
> > policy but it
> > + #
On Aug 14, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:44 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>> On 08/10/2010 10:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
The changes I made in svn:
- Move to slapd.conf
Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
>> Does the move to using slapd.d imply changes to other packages, or
>> is this a transition in the "move from state A to state B" sense
>> rather than the Debian "lots of packages changing at the same time
>> and making the release team cry" sense
[Adam D. Barratt]
> Does the move to using slapd.d imply changes to other packages, or
> is this a transition in the "move from state A to state B" sense
> rather than the Debian "lots of packages changing at the same time
> and making the release team cry" sense?
I have not investigated the detai
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:44 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 10:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
> >> The changes I made in svn:
> >> - Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
> >
> >
On Aug 14, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>>> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>>
The changes I made in svn:
- Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provide
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>
> >> The changes I made in svn:
> >> - Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
>
> > I must admit that this change makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2010 10:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>> The changes I made in svn:
>> - Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
>
> I must admit that this chang
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
>> The changes I made in svn:
>> - Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
> I must admit that this change makes me a little uneasy at first glance.
> I may just be paranoid though.
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 22:48 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
> The changes I made in svn:
> - Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
I must admit that this change makes me a little uneasy at first glance.
I may just be paranoid though. :-)
> - The fix for #589915 (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello release team,
First of all, the squeeze frozen status was a bit of a surprise for me.
So the schedule I had for openldap was not so good anymore.
The changes I made in svn:
- Move to slapd.conf to slapd.d (upgrade path provided and tested)
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
