On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:00:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
> benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
> realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Thu, 31, Jul, 2008 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno spoke thus..
tzdata-java is now waiting in NEW.
ACCEPTED.
Thanks.
Could we also have a freeze exception for lenny?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To U
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Thu, 31, Jul, 2008 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno spoke thus..
> > tzdata-java is now waiting in NEW.
>
> ACCEPTED.
>
Thanks.
Could we also have a freeze exception for lenny?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, 31, Jul, 2008 at 02:35:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno spoke thus..
> tzdata-java is now waiting in NEW.
ACCEPTED.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers
"But Yossarian *still* didn't understand either how Milo could buy eggs
in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa
for five cen
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:00:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
> benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
> realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
>
> - The current 6
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:34 -0700, David Herron wrote:
> Each synchronized security release involves simultaneous release of
> all current binary JDK bundles as well as OpenJDK 6/7 source releases
> of the same bug fixes. For OpenJDK there is some kind of behind the
> scenes source handshakin
[Matthias Klose]
> So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
> benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
> realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
Just for the record, Debian Edu would very much like to have the new
o
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
Is there upstream security support for OpenJDK 6?
* Matthias Klose:
> So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
> benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
> realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
Is there upstream security support for OpenJDK 6? I'm asking be
So, we are late with OpenJDK for lenny. I still think lenny would
benefit from having OpenJDK. I'm proposing the following steps,
realizing that not all of them probably can be realized.
- The current 6b11-2 package is not yet ready for migration. We will
need a -3 upload which properly
10 matches
Mail list logo
