On 04.03.2012 12:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 04.03.2012 11:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
sounds like a reasonable plan to me, cc:ing debian-release to get
a
comment on this, and cc:ing the at maintainer too.
(Predictably enough) I'd like to see a debdiff before a f
On 04.03.2012 11:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
sounds like a reasonable plan to me, cc:ing debian-release to get a
comment on this, and cc:ing the at maintainer too.
(Predictably enough) I'd like to see a debdiff before a final ack,
but
in principle it looks okay; th
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>> sounds like a reasonable plan to me, cc:ing debian-release to get a
>> comment on this, and cc:ing the at maintainer too.
>
> (Predictably enough) I'd like to see a debdiff before a final ack, but
> in principle it looks okay; thanks.
Attached below.
Regards,
Ansgar
On 02.03.2012 10:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on
links,
> +These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to
fail.
> +In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should
e
Hi,
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> > + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on links,
> > +These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to fail.
> > +In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should either:
> > +- Upgrade it to at l
5 matches
Mail list logo
