Re: Leafnode for sarge

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:00:34PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: > > leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :) > But it might need another update; 1.11.2 fixes a DoS vulnerability > in fetchnews with relatively minor impact. > What policy

Re: Leafnode for sarge

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:00:34PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: > > leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :) > But it might need another update; 1.11.2 fixes a DoS vulnerability > in fetchnews with relatively minor impact. That has now

Re: Leafnode for sarge

In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: > leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :) But it might need another update; 1.11.2 fixes a DoS vulnerability in fetchnews with relatively minor impact. What policy do you have for handling the outstanding fixed security bugs (as found on new

Re: Leafnode for sarge

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:45:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :) Yes, sorry - confusion due to the freeze announcment preceeding the archive update for yesterday causing me to think that no more automatic testing propagation would happen when in fa

Re: Leafnode for sarge

On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:14:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Please consider Leafnode 1.11.1-1 for inclusion in sarge. It fixes RC > bug #306380 (a recent update to update-inetd fixing #296902 caused > Leafnode's update-inetd usage to fall in all cases except initial > installation). While this

Leafnode for sarge

Please consider Leafnode 1.11.1-1 for inclusion in sarge. It fixes RC bug #306380 (a recent update to update-inetd fixing #296902 caused Leafnode's update-inetd usage to fall in all cases except initial installation). While this version of the package also includes a new upstream release the chan