Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
2014-07-16 22:32 GMT+02:00 Miguel Landaeta : > It's totally normal to have technical disagreements, especially on a > non-trivial packages like that one. What I really dislike is to > see epithets like "bullshit" or "own agenda" in a technical > discussion. > +1 -- Arnaud Vandyck http://about.m

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-16 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:50:46AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > I think that is unfair statement against Emmanuel (especially when > adding d-d & d-r to the cc list). Totally agree with Sylvestre on this. I also have sponsored many packages for Emmanuel in the Java team. Frankly, I don't g

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-16 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports >> source/target level 1.5: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html >> >> So if you update a package a

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-15 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose a écrit : > No. Don't do it. This is complete bullshit for Debian at this point. We are > trying to prepare a release, working on a possible update to Java 8, and we > don't have the resources to work on Java 9 at this time. Ok, but could you say it nicely ple

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports > source/target level 1.5: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html > > So if you update a package and see these settings please bump them to 1.6. >