Re: Issue in "Bad" regexp for ruby1.8-removal transition

2013-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1], > How is this supposed to work, anyway? > • I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere. It was pret

Re: Issue in "Bad" regexp for ruby1.8-removal transition

2013-09-09 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > > On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1], > > How is this supposed to work, anyway? > > • I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere. It

Re: Issue in "Bad" regexp for ruby1.8-removal transition

2013-09-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1], How is this supposed to work, anyway? • I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere. • ruby1.9.1 Build-Depends ruby1.8 bye, //mirabilos -- «MyISAM tables -will- get

Re: Issue in "Bad" regexp for ruby1.8-removal transition

2013-09-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:06 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1], > at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing. > > Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp: > > Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby

Issue in "Bad" regexp for ruby1.8-removal transition

2013-09-02 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Hi! On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1], at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing. Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp: Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby1.8/ which should probably be: Bad: .depends ~ /(lib)?ruby1