On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 14:34:21 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:46:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Which means
> > libcgal-ipelets needs to be built against the new version.
>
> The libcgal-ipelets package is non-free. I would not have expected
> non-free to
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:33:14PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve M. Robbins (29/12/2011):
> > Ipe 7.1.1-1 was uploaded 17 days ago with no RC bugs but has not made
> > it into testing. The excuse is below. Does this need some manual
> > intervention from the release team?
> >
>
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:46:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:21:04 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ipe 7.1.1-1 was uploaded 17 days ago with no RC bugs but has not made
> > it into testing. The excuse is below. Does this need some manual
> > inte
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:21:04 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ipe 7.1.1-1 was uploaded 17 days ago with no RC bugs but has not made
> it into testing. The excuse is below. Does this need some manual
> intervention from the release team?
>
No, libipe7.1.0 needs to stop having revers
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins (29/12/2011):
> Ipe 7.1.1-1 was uploaded 17 days ago with no RC bugs but has not made
> it into testing. The excuse is below. Does this need some manual
> intervention from the release team?
>
>
> Excuse for ipe
>
> 17 days old (needed 10 days)
> out of date on i
Hi,
Ipe 7.1.1-1 was uploaded 17 days ago with no RC bugs but has not made
it into testing. The excuse is below. Does this need some manual
intervention from the release team?
Excuse for ipe
17 days old (needed 10 days)
out of date on i386: libipe7.1.0 (from 7.1.0-1)
out of date on
6 matches
Mail list logo
