On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 20:38:01 +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Questions:
> 1/ In case someone noticed lacks in NEWS file, would the RT allow
> migration to testing after freeze only for NEWS file update ?
I'd certainly hope so (documentation updates have been allowed in early
stages of the free
* Simon Paillard (spaill...@debian.org) [100404 20:38]:
> 1/ In case someone noticed lacks in NEWS file, would the RT allow
> migration to testing after freeze only for NEWS file update ?
Depends on how long the freeze will probably take, but as long as we
allow to migrate for l10n-upgrades, NEWS-
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:19:19PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > The release notes need to be updated for squeeze and upgrade and
> > > installation tests on different conf
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:12:42 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Of course, if I can either get the first or the third priority done,
> it's obvious what I do. If I however can make things better "for the
> press" without getting things worse for the developers, why not do it?
>
One reason could be
* Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org) [100324 08:27]:
> WRT concerns about the way such text can be interpreted by "the press"
> or whoever not directly involved in Debian and is reading d-d-a, I
> think that should go *after* the need to inform developers.
I think the priorities are (in this o
Quoting Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org):
> Eh, who said we're not going to use the *information*? But the way of
> presenting "I write an text about what the release team thinks" is not
> going to help, and I think the criticsmn raised from e.g. Alexander is
.../... (plus what Marc followed
* Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org) [100323 16:47]:
> Quoting Clint Adams (sch...@debian.org):
>
> > > I do not want *this* assistance, thanks. I think we played this charade
> > > long enough. By now, everyone should know that you don't like the way
> > > the release team has done its work,
Christian PERRIER writes:
>>> I do not want *this* assistance, thanks. I think we played this charade
>>> long enough. By now, everyone should know that you don't like the way
>>> the release team has done its work, you have saved face and no one will
>>> say that you only criticize the RT without
Quoting Clint Adams (sch...@debian.org):
> > I do not want *this* assistance, thanks. I think we played this charade
> > long enough. By now, everyone should know that you don't like the way
> > the release team has done its work, you have saved face and no one will
> > say that you only criticize
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:02:43PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> I do not want *this* assistance, thanks. I think we played this charade
> long enough. By now, everyone should know that you don't like the way
> the release team has done its work, you have saved face and no one will
> say t
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:28:28AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> With as well as without my press hat I find the proposed text rather
> suboptimal. Even as a developer who lurks around this list I don't know
> what most of the text is supposed to tell me. I think many fellow DDs
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:31:16AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> This is far from the truth. The open BTS reports listed only relates
Thanks for the clarification. I have incorporated this information, and
the WIP is (temporarily) available at
http://people.debian.org/~schizo/tmp/release-u
Clint Adams writes:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:11:00AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Actually, we should give our developers (and the press who is reading
>> that as well) an truthfull "status quo" of our activities. Also, it's
>> not "Andreas Barth wants that", but either the release team wa
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:11:00AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Duh... everybody should care. Skip this.
I find this offensive.
> You're not a reporter that quotes what other people are saying.
> This should be using "we":
As in the previous case, I am writing this in my own voice. I am
not
Hi!
Andreas Barth schrieb:
This is not adequate for sending out to d-d-a.
Actually, we should give our developers (and the press who is reading
that as well) an truthfull "status quo" of our activities. Also, it's
not "Andreas Barth wants that", but either the release team wants it,
or we don'
* Clint Adams (sch...@debian.org) [100323 02:31]:
> If you don't care about Debian 6.0 (codename "squeeze"),
> please skip this release update.
>
> Andreas Barth would like to sy that we have recently
> discussed the situation of the release, and it looks
> like we can pull the release off if we a
[Clint Adams]
> Open bugs[10] still remain in the way of the "Boot
> Performance" release goal.
This is far from the truth. The open BTS reports listed only relates
to one small part of this release goal - the dependency based boot
sequencing. Work on improving boot speed have almost stalled, w
(Some comments with my external POV)
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Clint Adams wrote:
> If you don't care about Debian 6.0 (codename "squeeze"),
> please skip this release update.
Duh... everybody should care. Skip this.
> Andreas Barth would like to sy that we have recently
> discussed the situation of
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:57:51PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Yes, please!
Draft below
--8<---snip---8<--
Dear Developers,
If you don't care about Debian 6.0 (codename "squeeze"),
please skip this release update.
Andreas Barth would like to sy that we have recently
discussed the sit
Simon Paillard writes:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> > There is also the issue of the release notes. This was a problem for
>> > lenny, and it doesn't look like it will get any better for
>> > squeeze. Th
Clint Adams writes:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> I would be happy if you could point out any specific insanity in the
>> notes of the IRC meeting from yesterday. If it seems fine, it would be
>> great if you could work on drafting a release update in
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > There is also the issue of the release notes. This was a problem for
> > lenny, and it doesn't look like it will get any better for
> > squeeze. The release notes need to b
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> There is also the issue of the release notes. This was a problem for
> lenny, and it doesn't look like it will get any better for
> squeeze. The release notes need to be updated for squeeze and upgrade
> and installation tests on different config
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> I would be happy if you could point out any specific insanity in the
> notes of the IRC meeting from yesterday. If it seems fine, it would be
> great if you could work on drafting a release update informing the
> project abou
Heya,
I don't know if you are subscribed to -release@ - I guess so, but CCed
anyway.
Clint Adams writes:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:37:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> OK, I'm not sure how much of that is an actual offer, but I would be
>> happy to accept any help you can give. Do
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:37:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> OK, I'm not sure how much of that is an actual offer, but I would be
> happy to accept any help you can give. Do you have any ideas how you
> could help the release team, or, in a more general way, the release?
How would you
Heya,
[CC/M-F-T -release@ set, don't see why this needs to be on -devel]
Clint Adams writes:
> I do not really know what you are talking about, but I do not
> want the kids on the playground calling me a coward, so you
> clearly have given me no choice but to accept your offer.
> Unless you want
27 matches
Mail list logo
