Re: Bug#491354: Handling of RC licensing bugs in TeXLive

2008-09-21 Thread Andreas Barth
tag 477060 + lenny-ignore tag 483217 + lenny-ignore tag 491354 + lenny-ignore thanks * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080727 19:29]: > So this has to be acted on. For one of the three bugs, we ask for a > lenny-ignore tag. For one more, we ask you to consider this, although we > are unsure whet

Re: Bug#491354: Handling of RC licensing bugs in TeXLive

2008-07-27 Thread Frank Küster
Hi all, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear release team, > > I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive > packages, will someone among you find time to handle this issue? You are probably aware that the texlive cannot simply be removed if their RC bug seems

Re: Bug#491354: Handling of RC licensing bugs in TeXLive

2008-07-21 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all, I might add one point: On So, 20 Jul 2008, Frank K�ster wrote: > #477060, amslatex license; Source Package: texlive-base Removing amslatex would severly reduce the usability of TeX on Debian. Nowadays practically all articles using some formulas are using amslatex packages, and this is s

Handling of RC licensing bugs in TeXLive

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Küster
Dear release team, I kindly request your advice on handling three RC bugs in TeXLive packages, and maybe ask for a lenny-ignore tag. Although all bug numbers look quite recent, the first two are actually very old. But these issues were originally reported against existing bugs in teTeX which coll