dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:46:34AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> CC: linux-paric mailing list
>>
>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> He
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:46:34AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> CC: linux-paric mailing list
>
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> >>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am D
CC: linux-paric mailing list
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> Patch in parisc git tree:
> htt
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> > >
> > >> Patch in parisc git tree:
> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:43:22AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> >
> >> Patch in parisc git tree:
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 01:05:55PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > >> dann frazier wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Pete
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> >> dann frazier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezemb
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:23:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
>
> > Patch in parisc git tree:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf03213
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
>
>> Patch in parisc git tree:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf032137aacb3640d7dd9d75b2b607
>
> So just using a
Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
> Patch in parisc git tree:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kyle/parisc-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=378fe7c4cc619b561409206605c723c05358edac;hp=6c4dfa8f8bcf032137aacb3640d7dd9d75b2b607
So just using an SMP kernel should also work?
-
dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> dann frazier wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> Matt Taggart wrote:
>> The real problem is that
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:57:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
> >> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes st
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:27:38PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> >> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
> > [snip]
> >> What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host?
> >=20
> > How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable
> > as a buildd hos
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
>> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes stuff
>> break on newer, faster hardware. And if we want to provide
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes stuff
> break on newer, faster hardware. And if we want to provide a stable and
> useful port
Christoph Martin schrieb am Freitag, dem 19. Dezember 2008:
> Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>
> >
> > If it builds successfully, please try with the lenny kernel as well.
>
> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
>
> I know the the c100 is really slow. But if it can help as a buildd host
> pleas
Who is not sensible? Did you read the thread about this? I offered to
help with my maschine and said from the beginning that is is only a
C100. Peter and Lucas told me to build a chroot and try some builds
because I think they were considering my offer. Now when I present the
results, you tell me t
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Christoph Martin wrote:
> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
[snip]
> What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host?
How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable
as a buildd host. Your offer is certainly gene
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
>
> If it builds successfully, please try with the lenny kernel as well.
The kernel build succeded after 71 hours.
I know the the c100 is really slow. But if it can help as a buildd host
please let me know.
What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:08:59PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> >>
> >>> Matt Taggart wrote:
> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa k
dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>>
>>> Matt Taggart wrote:
The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't
see
much point in keeping the archive
Martin Zobel-Helas schrieb am Dienstag, dem 16. Dezember 2008:
> On Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 20:57:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, J?rgen Leibner wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi @all,
> > >
> > > I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date D
Hi,
On Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 20:57:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, J?rgen Leibner wrote:
> >
> > Hi @all,
> >
> > I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date Debian
> > 5.0 (unstable/testing) with running the debian kernel
> >
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Jürgen Leibner wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members
> > of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was
> > doing. First c
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
>
> > Matt Taggart wrote:
> > > The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't
> > > see
> > > much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody
Helge Deller schrieb am Montag, dem 15. Dezember 2008:
> Matt Taggart wrote:
> > The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
> > much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
> > the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the futu
On 15/12/08 at 15:45 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
> After that I have to kill -9 a miniruby process. Is this a ruby on hppa
> problem or a problem with my box?
an hppa kernel problem.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
Christoph Martin schrieb:
>
> Martin, Christoph schrieb:
>> Peter Palfrader schrieb:
>>> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>>>
I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
could help as an autobuilder.
>>> Is it able to boot recent ker
Matt Taggart wrote:
> The real problem is that no one is fixing hppa kernel problems. I don't see
> much point in keeping the archive up to date if nobody is working on fixing
> the kernel (not currently and I suspect not in the future either). This has
> been stated on the debian-hppa list seve
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Matt Taggart wrote:
> A c100 is _really_ slow and probably wouldn't be able to keep up as a
> buildd.
I've already offered countless times (it's in the m-l archive) to
provide buildd power from the ESIEE cluster (see
http://www.fr.parisc-linux.org/cluster.html),
On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members
> of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was
> doing. First concerns about this architecture were raised at least
> half a year ago, and
> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> could help as an autobuilder.
>
> What do you think?
A c100 is _really_ slow and probably wouldn't be able to keep up as a
buildd.
It _might_ have more luck in building some things because of the difference
in processo
On 14/12/08 at 21:25 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>
> Martin, Christoph schrieb:
> > Peter Palfrader schrieb:
> >> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
> >>
> >>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> >>> could help as an autobuilder.
Martin, Christoph schrieb:
> Peter Palfrader schrieb:
>> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>>
>>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
>>> could help as an autobuilder.
>> Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully?
>
> It runs w
Peter Palfrader schrieb:
> Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
>
>> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
>> could help as an autobuilder.
>
> Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully?
It runs with 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-parisc
> Can
Christoph Martin schrieb am Sonntag, dem 14. Dezember 2008:
> I just installed a old hppa (c100) machine with etch. Maybe the machine
> could help as an autobuilder.
Is it able to boot recent kernels successfully? Can it build ruby1.9
successfully, without dying, in an up-to-date sid chroot? Ca
Hi,
while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members of DSA
and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was doing. First
concerns about this architecture were raised at least half a year ago, and it
doesn't appear as if we are any closer to resolving them. It do
37 matches
Mail list logo
