Hubert Chan a écrit :
>On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think it would be very hard to get /usr/GNUstep added to FHS.
>
>
>
/usr/OpenStep ?
>For some strange reason, -policy seems to be rather quiet on this issue
>this time around. There
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:19:30PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> /usr/X11R6 is specified specifically as an option in FHS and was
> basically grandfathered in. And it seems Branden thinks that it will
> eventually disappear (or at least be replaced by symlinks).
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-deve
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> * Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature
> There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory.
> GNUstep is not a dif
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
> * Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature
There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory.
GNUstep is not a different case, just a less important one. For now.
> (I am CC-ing Anton Zinoviev, w
Hubert Chan a écrit :
>
> Have you been successful it making it more FHS compliant? (e.g. moving
> Library/Headers to /usr/include, moving Library/Preferences,
> Library/Images, etc. to /usr/share, etc.) Is there anything in
> particular that caused problems?
Well, the best option is to install
Steve Langasek a écrit :
>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>I think the FHS itself is clear on this point, that /opt is only for use by
>third-party software bundles.
>
>
>
FHS 2.3 says add-on and not third-party. This why I talked about /opt
>>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> Actually, there are in Debian (sarge, etch, sid) more than 50 packages
> that are parts of the GNUstep Environment. But there is a big issue with
> all of them: none are FHS compliant.
> The development of GNUstep started a long ti
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:23:10 +0200, Eric Heintzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I co-maintain the GNUstep Core packages for more than 2 years, and I
> spend a lot of time to find a solution to these problems by moving
> files accordingly to FHS, and by symlinking some directories. After
> several
* Eric Heintzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since there is no other maintainer to try to make these packages FHS
> compliant, should GNUstep be removed from Debian ?
Speaking on behalf of the tiny Bulgarian GNUstep community I would
like to ask you (and RMs as well) not to remove GNUstep from
Hi,
Actually, there are in Debian (sarge, etch, sid) more than 50 packages
that are parts of the GNUstep Environment. But there is a big issue with
all of them: none are FHS compliant.
The development of GNUstep started a long time before the birth of the
File Hierarchy Standard, and since they i
10 matches
Mail list logo
