Re: Freeze exception for inetutils 2:1.8-1

Hi! On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:45:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. Well, me too I guess, probably too late anyway. > Are there any other distributions currently shipping 1.8? The only other distributions I've found (after a cursory look) shipping inetut

Re: Freeze exception for inetutils 2:1.8-1

Hi, Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 12:55 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > We currently have 1.6 in the archive and the biggest difference between > that and 1.8 is lots of code rearrangment, cleanup and mechanical > changes, which would make my life more difficult w

Freeze exception for inetutils 2:1.8-1

Hi! I've also expected the freeze to come later in August, and sadly didn't prioritize uploading the new inetutils upstream release. So I'd like to request approval to do so now, given the (previous and) following arguments. We currently have 1.6 in the archive and the biggest difference between