On Oct 6, 2012 7:53 AM, "Niels Thykier" wrote:
>
> On 2012-09-30 00:50, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > Would you accept a freeze exception for csound version
> > 1:5.17.11~dfsg-2 (just uploaded), to include the attached patch (no
>
On 2012-09-30 00:50, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Would you accept a freeze exception for csound version
> 1:5.17.11~dfsg-2 (just uploaded), to include the attached patch (no
> other changes)?
>
> The build system wrongly passes the "-package csnd&quo
Dear release team,
Would you accept a freeze exception for csound version
1:5.17.11~dfsg-2 (just uploaded), to include the attached patch (no
other changes)?
The build system wrongly passes the "-package csnd" flag to the SWIG
interface wrappers, which causes the csound JNI library
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 22:38, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
>> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
>> one could a
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
> one could argue for a higher severity given that it segfaults whenever
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 20:37:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Uploaded. Thanks!
>
and unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 16:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
>> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
>> one could a
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:13:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
> already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
> one could argue for a higher severity given that it segfaults whenever
>
Dear release team,
Recently, a bug was reported against csound (#603321), which was
already fixed in upstream CVS. The bug is severity: normal, although
one could argue for a higher severity given that it segfaults whenever
using a certain opcode.
Here is the entire patch:
Description: Acquire b
* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:04:26 +0100]:
> * Felipe Sateler [Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:42:47 -0300]:
> > El 07/11/08 15:04 Adeodato Simó escribió:
> > > * Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:28:27 -0300]:
> > > > OK, so I have a fix for the alpha issue (I'm surprised it hadn't failed
> > > >
* Felipe Sateler [Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:42:47 -0300]:
> El 07/11/08 15:04 Adeodato Simó escribió:
> > * Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:28:27 -0300]:
> > > OK, so I have a fix for the alpha issue (I'm surprised it hadn't failed
> > > before, it was an alpha-specific fix with a typo).
> > Ok, pl
El 07/11/08 15:04 Adeodato Simó escribió:
> * Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:28:27 -0300]:
> > OK, so I have a fix for the alpha issue (I'm surprised it hadn't failed
> > before, it was an alpha-specific fix with a typo).
>
> Ok, please upload it.
FYI, Jonas uploaded a fix for this, the java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:28:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>El 03/11/08 12:02 Felipe Sateler escribió:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel, is this something y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:37:48PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>El 03/11/08 12:04 Andreas Barth escribió:
>> If any of your package fails to build, the makefile needs to notice
>> that and stop the build process. If not, the packages is
>> fundamen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 06:50:58PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:37:48 -0300]:
>
>> The problem would have consequences only if whoever uploads the package
>> doesn't have ghostscript installed: the documentation i
* Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:28:27 -0300]:
> OK, so I have a fix for the alpha issue (I'm surprised it hadn't failed
> before, it was an alpha-specific fix with a typo).
Ok, please upload it.
> I still have no clues as to why Java is not being picked up in mipsel
> and alpha: both seem
* Felipe Sateler [Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:37:48 -0300]:
> The problem would have consequences only if whoever uploads the package
> doesn't have ghostscript installed: the documentation is only in an arch:all
> package.
In that case, gs (and whatever else for building the documentation in
the build
El 03/11/08 12:04 Andreas Barth escribió:
> * Jonas Smedegaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081103 15:58]:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 2
El 03/11/08 12:02 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +01
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:00:48PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
[snipped issue commented in response to Andreas]
>In addition, the mips buildlog for testing shows a number of
>"Permission denied" problems, those are also not caught. This looks
>like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:04:01PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>* Jonas Smedegaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081103 15:58]:
>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34A
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +0100]:
>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -
* Jonas Smedegaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081103 15:58]:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> >>
> >> >Package fail
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> >>
> >> >Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
>>
>> >Package failed to buid on alpha
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
>
> >Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel, is this something you would
> >know something about?
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
>Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel, is this something you would
>know something about?
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroe
* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +0100]:
> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +0100]:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was filed against cs
* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +0100]:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was filed against csound
> >(503633) . I have reuploaded to mentors a fix, but I can't upload to
> >t-p-u since I'm not a DD. My co-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was filed against csound
>(503633) . I have reuploaded to mentors a fix, but I can't upload to
>t-p-u since I'm not a DD. My co-maintainer (CCed
Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was filed against csound (503633) . I
have reuploaded to mentors a fix, but I can't upload to t-p-u since I'm not a
DD. My co-maintainer (CCed) seems to be busy right now.
Would any of the release team review and upload the changes?
Saludos,
Felipe Satel
* Felipe Sateler [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:07:20 -0400]:
> Yes. The upload should be targeted at testing-proposed-updates?
Yes.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
El 01/10/08 02:36 Pierre Habouzit escribió:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:31:03PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Hi release team. I'd like to ask if an update for csound is possible. It
> > brings 2 changes that are the reason for the update request. The first
> > one is that the csound library co
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:31:03PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi release team. I'd like to ask if an update for csound is possible. It
> brings 2 changes that are the reason for the update request. The first one is
> that the csound library comes with a few plugins, but they weren't versioned
Hi release team. I'd like to ask if an update for csound is possible. It
brings 2 changes that are the reason for the update request. The first one is
that the csound library comes with a few plugins, but they weren't versioned
with the library. This violates policy 8.2, although no bug has been
36 matches
Mail list logo
