On 09/21/2010 01:36 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:58:36 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> How about letting cron depend on the new passwd package instead of
>> breaking the old? ISTM this would have been the better action for
>> #541415 as well.
>>
> Sounds like that would
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:58:36 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> How about letting cron depend on the new passwd package instead of
> breaking the old? ISTM this would have been the better action for
> #541415 as well.
>
Sounds like that would work.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On 2010-09-21 11:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 19:10:50 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
>> On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> >
>> >> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 relea
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 19:10:50 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >
> >> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
> >> wondering whether the Release Te
On 09/19/2010 06:21 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
>> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
>> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with
>> this feature removed from /etc/cr
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:21:38 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Assuming that #596283 will be fixed by a -2 release of shadow, I was
> wondering whether the Release Team would like a cron -115 as well, with
> this feature removed from /etc/cron.daily/standard.
>
Sounds reasonable. I'm not sur
Hi,
On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
> * debian/passwd.cron.daily: Handle the backups of the user and group
> databases so that it can be removed from the standard daily cron job.
> Closes: #554170
I only now noticed that this version of shadow entered testing.
Assuming
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 23:31:59 +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Dear RMs,
>
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:11:39PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >
> > Any news regarding shadow's upload?
>
> I've prepared this package for review/approval before an upload:
> http://alioth.debian.org/~nekral-guest
Dear RMs,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:11:39PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Any news regarding shadow's upload?
I've prepared this package for review/approval before an upload:
http://alioth.debian.org/~nekral-guest/packages/shadow/
Best Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@dogguy.org):
> On 08/20/2010 12:06 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. Is the correct revision to look from is r3051? If
> > so, then please upload.
> >
>
> Any news regarding shadow's upload?
I see tons of commits in the SVN so I guess that,
On 08/20/2010 12:06 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay. Is the correct revision to look from is r3051? If
> so, then please upload.
>
Any news regarding shadow's upload?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-req
Hi,
Sorry for the delay. Is the correct revision to look from is r3051? If
so, then please upload.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
> >
> > More seriously, I need to find what would be the preferred next shadow
> > release:
> > [1] Prepare an upstream release and a Debian package based on it
> > [2] Package the curre
On 08/18/2010 08:31 PM, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> More seriously, I need to find what would be the preferred next shadow
> release:
> [1] Prepare an upstream release and a Debian package based on it
> [2] Package the current upstream trunk (this is mostly ready but must be
> tested, and I ne
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:24:50PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Can I trade this unblock with an upload of src:shadow? :) It has 3 RC
> bugs tagged as pending since months.
Looks like I'm trading for additional work I would have to do.
This looks biased;)
More seriously, I need to find
15 matches
Mail list logo