Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-25 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:05:45PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > So now it looks like I need to upload two changes for emacs23 for > wheezy: this change to remove the emacs binary package, and a CVE fix > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684695). So first > question -- do you

Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-25 Thread Rob Browning
Julien Cristau writes: > Really shouldn't use the emacs version as epoch. That's also not what > gcc does. Right -- not going to do that. I'm just going to use a sufficiently large native version, i.e. 45.0. So now it looks like I need to upload two changes for emacs23 for wheezy: this change

Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 18:25:28 -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > I suppose we could do what gcc-defaults does, i.e. 4:4.7.1-1, or in this > case 23:*. That might be reasonable. > Really shouldn't use the emacs version as epoch. That's also not what gcc does. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Descrip

Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-08 Thread Rob Browning
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > [Added Rob to recipients, as I assumed he's not subscribed] (Thanks, I'm not.) > > On 01.08.2012 13:04, Axel Beckert wrote: >> Rob Browning wrote: >>> ... a bit of discussion on IRC produced a plan that I'd like to vet >>> here: >>> >>> - Upload a new emacs23 to f

Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Added Rob to recipients, as I assumed he's not subscribed] On 01.08.2012 13:04, Axel Beckert wrote: Rob Browning wrote: I made a bit of a mess with respect to the emacs metapackage in unstable and wheezy that I'd like to fix. The problem is that both emacs23 and emacs24 provide the emacs met

Re: Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-08-01 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Rob Browning wrote: > I made a bit of a mess with respect to the emacs metapackage in unstable > and wheezy that I'd like to fix. > > The problem is that both emacs23 and emacs24 provide the emacs > metapackage, With "provide" you mean "build" as in "source-package builds binary-package", not

Fixing mess involving emacs23, emacs24, and the emacs metapackage

2012-07-28 Thread Rob Browning
I made a bit of a mess with respect to the emacs metapackage in unstable and wheezy that I'd like to fix. The problem is that both emacs23 and emacs24 provide the emacs metapackage, and of course, at DebConf, Adam pointed out that as soon as we need updates to emacs23, we'll have a problem. One