On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:39:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Seamonkey 1.1 is not yet in the archive, but is being worked on at the
> > > m
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:08:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Seamonkey 1.1 is not yet in the archive, but is being worked on at the
> > moment and should be uploaded some day soon (well, a 1.1a package). But
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:53:15AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Seamonkey 1.1 is not yet in the archive, but is being worked on at the
> moment and should be uploaded some day soon (well, a 1.1a package). But
> Seamonkey 1.0 not being in the archive makes it easy for us to just
> decide to not inclu
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:57:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060925 20:55]:
> > I'm hereby requesting an exception for both of these (plus xulrunner).
> > The main reason for this request is that upstream will stop security
> > su
Hi,
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060925 20:55]:
> I'm hereby requesting an exception for both of these (plus xulrunner).
> The main reason for this request is that upstream will stop security
> support for the 1.8.0 branch (which the current versions of the packages
> are based on) as soon a
Hi RMs,
As you may or may not know, Firefox 2.0 and Seamonkey 1.1 are due at the
end of october. Thunderbird 2.0, on the other hand is due at the end of
november, beginning of december. While Thunderbird 2.0 would be hard to
get in time for etch (planned for early december), Firefox and Seamonkey
6 matches
Mail list logo
