Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Debian-Release,
>
> The package "flashplugin-nonfree" version 9.0.31.0.1 is in unstable
> (contrib). I suggest to allow that version to go to stable when etch is
> released.
Unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
F
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 08:02 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Now, so as not to have everyone contact us at once about packages we
> > know we won't approve, here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> > accepted into testing during the
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Now, so as not to have everyone contact us at once about packages we
> know we won't approve, here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> accepted into testing during the freeze:
>
> - fixes for release critical bugs (i.e., bugs of
Bart Martens wrote:
> Package "angrydd" version 1.0.1-5 is in unstable. The differences with
> testing are:
Unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Descript
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix to
> unstable and contact [E
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
>> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
>> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix to
>>
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix to
> unstable and contact [E
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
>> accepted into testing during the freeze:
>
>> - translation updates and
>
> Package "phalanx" version 22+d051004-4 is in unstable. The only
>
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> accepted into testing during the freeze:
> - translation updates and
Package "phalanx" version 22+d051004-4 is in unstable. The only
difference with testing is a translation update. It
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:18:28PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> Version 2.6.8-0.1 broke spell checking. The --enable-spell configure
> option behaves slightly different in the newest upstream version, and I
> overlooked that. This regression is fixed in version 2.6.8-0.3.
>
> The other changes a
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:47:09AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2
>>> in?
>> Yes, unblock hint added.
>
> Thanks! :-)
>
>
>> Updates that only include RC bug fixes, translation or documentation
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:47:09AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2
> > in?
>
> Yes, unblock hint added.
Thanks! :-)
> Updates that only include RC bug fixes, translation or documentation updates
> are fine.
But I will h
* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 17:07]:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> > unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
>
Hello,
On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix
Hello Andi,
On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freeze does really mean: No new changes unless really required.
you meman, I should consider opening an RC bug against the package?
You also didn't answer the questions about the other packages.
Best
Hello Andi,
On Tue, 12.12.2006 at 12:18:44 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but that are way too many changes after freeze.
well, the 1.2.1-4 package version is much more broken, and it did take
so much time to clean up for a reason (and some RL factors I could not
influ
* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:22]:
> and some non-reported packaging errors like overwriting config files,
> wrongly being packaged as a Debian native package when it should have
> been a "normal" package, garbled source,* and, as a feature, (hopefully)
> fixed runit support - the o
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Nicolas
> Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2
> in?
Yes, unblock hint added.
> And if you will, will you also allow the possible upcoming releases that
> add some debconf translations?
Updates that only include RC bug fixes, t
Hi,
First of all, congratulations for freezing etch, that's very good news!
:-)
Now, a question about a package of mine: will you allow isync 1.0.3-2
in?
Before I uploaded to unstable, I asked you (the list) and Steve replied
it was alright.
As a summary, it is a new upstream release that so
Hello,
On Mon, 11.12.2006 at 11:08:50 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the version is the
> same between testing and unstable), please upload your fix
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> This means that, for all packages that still need to be updated for
>> Etch, the rules are as follows:
>>
>> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
>> unstable do
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> This means that, for all packages that still need to be updated for
> Etch, the rules are as follows:
>
> - If your package needs to be updated for Etch, and the version in
> unstable doesn't contain extraneous changes (e.g, the versi
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
>> accepted into testing during the freeze:
>
>> - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
>> or extra, only when
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> accepted into testing during the freeze:
> - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
> or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
> - documenta
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
>> accepted into testing during the freeze:
>> - translation updates and
>
> Package "epos" version 1:2.5.37-3 is in unstable. The only differenc
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> here are the guidelines for changes that will be
> accepted into testing during the freeze:
> - translation updates and
Package "epos" version 1:2.5.37-3 is in unstable. The only difference
with testing is a translation update. It woul
* Ian Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 16:11]:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:28 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ian Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 15:24]:
> > > Ivtv 0.8.0-2 was due to propagate in today. It was waiting for the
> > > 2.6.18 kernel to enter testing due to an unfortunately t
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:28 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ian Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 15:24]:
> > Ivtv 0.8.0-2 was due to propagate in today. It was waiting for the
> > 2.6.18 kernel to enter testing due to an unfortunately tight kernel
> > version dependency in the driver. I closed
* Ian Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 15:24]:
> Ivtv 0.8.0-2 was due to propagate in today. It was waiting for the
> 2.6.18 kernel to enter testing due to an unfortunately tight kernel
> version dependency in the driver. I closed the RC bug (#397831) which
> was enforcing this yesterday when I
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:08 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Etch is now frozen! Wheee!!!
Good news!
> - If you have a package that needs updating, *please* don't forget to
> contact us. *Don't expect us to find out about it on our own*.
> Putting a comment in the changelog is not
30 matches
Mail list logo
