Quoting Steve Langasek
> > The reason for my mail is that I thought new upstream releases
> > were not allowed.
>
> New upstream versions are discouraged; but we are not in a freeze. This
> particular emacs build includes security fixes we've been waiting on for a
> while.
Alright.
> > > $ grep
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Emacs 21.4a-1 has been built in all architectures. It is basically 21.3
> > >
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Emacs 21.4a-1 has been built in all architectures. It is basically 21.3
> > >
Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Emacs 21.4a-1 has been built in all architectures. It is basically 21.3
> > plus the security patch which was applied in 21.3+1-9, a fix for
> > a s
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Emacs 21.4a-1 has been built in all architectures. It is basically 21.3
> plus the security patch which was applied in 21.3+1-9, a fix for
> a seriaous bug in debian/rules preventing from building in some cases,
> as w
Dear release managers,
Emacs 21.4a-1 has been built in all architectures. It is basically 21.3
plus the security patch which was applied in 21.3+1-9, a fix for
a seriaous bug in debian/rules preventing from building in some cases,
as well as usual bugfixes.
I think it can safely enter testing
6 matches
Mail list logo
