Re: Easy removals: C and D

2006-05-31 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. You'll see some source package names which don't.) # 365794 remove cbrowser/0.8-1 Unreproducible, possibly specific to a tk varia

Re: Easy removals: C and D

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. > You'll see some source package names which don't.) > # 365794 > remove cbrowser/0.8-1 Unreproducible, possibly specific to a tk variant that's been remov

Re: cgiirc removal (was: Easy removals: C and D)

2006-05-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm currently (almost done) updating cgiirc packages, I intend to adopt >or NMU this, closing this and many other bugs. I would like to remind you of the following statement which I made with the first of these "easy kick-out-of-etch" messages: >These all have RC b

cgiirc removal (was: Easy removals: C and D)

2006-05-09 Thread Damián Viano
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:04:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. > You'll see some source package names which don't.) > # 365680, security > remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 I'm currently (almost done) updating cgiirc packa

Easy removals: C and D

2006-05-09 Thread Nathanael Nerode
C and D packages. (Binary package names beginning with C and D, that is. You'll see some source package names which don't.) # 365794 remove cbrowser/0.8-1 # 365680, security remove cgiirc/0.5.4-6 # 365181 remove s-http-server/20051218-1 # 340177, security remove cscope/15.5-1.1 # 366128 remove di