Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 23.10.2010 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. > >> > >> > >> With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 whic

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Adam! On 23.10.2010 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. >> >> >> With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 which >> removes >> the deprecated libdevkit-power-gobject li

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. > > > With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 which > removes > the deprecated libdevkit-power-gobject library, closing #595083. > > I've also included a fix for #5

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 19.10.2010 21:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) >>> >>> Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to >>> libha

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) > > > > Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to > > libhal-glib being removed (as it is no longer used)

Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Adam, thanks for unblocking tracker 0.8.17-1 On 10.10.2010 16:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Currently there are 4 packages remaining (in squeeze) that still depend on >> libdevkit-power-gobject: >> - gdm3 2.30.2-4 >> - tracker 0.8.15

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: > 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) > > Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to > libhal-glib being removed (as it is no longer used), and if you don't count > the > very verbose Changelog, the diffst

Re: unblock tracker 0.8.17-1 (was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, October 15, 2010 18:16, Michael Biebl wrote: > Yes, my plan is to get tracker 0.8.17. I just waited until evo 2.30.3 has > transitioned to testing, which is now the case. > > 0.8.16 and 0.8.17 were pure bug fix and translation releases. > 0.8.15-1 also contains a patch which should probably

unblock tracker 0.8.17-1 (was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Biebl
On 10.10.2010 16:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > I see that tracker 0.8.17 has been uploaded in the meantime. Were you > planning on requesting an unblock for that? After excluding changes to > the testsuite, translations, documentation,

Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.

2010-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:56 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > libdevkit-power-gobject is the old ABI that was provided by DeviceKit-power. > DeviceKit-power has been replaced by UPower. > UPower though still provides the old ABI via a compat lib, which I'd like to > get > rid of in squeeze (this compa

Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.

2010-09-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 20:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > Note that since the 2.32 release for both these modules consists in > > bugfixes and translations, I will try to get them accepted into squeeze. > > Is there an ETA for the packages (and, more to the point, the unblock > requ

Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.

2010-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010 à 08:56 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > > The alternative for gnome-power-manager and gnome-session is to wait for > > their > > 2.32 release, which contain the ports to upower already. > > Note that since

Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.

2010-09-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010 à 08:56 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : > The alternative for gnome-power-manager and gnome-session is to wait for their > 2.32 release, which contain the ports to upower already. Note that since the 2.32 release for both these modules consists in bugfixes and translat