Re: Do we want to change libxml2's package name

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:15:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a > >> transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand, > >> leaving the package as it i

Re: Do we want to change libxml2's package name

Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote: >> I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a >> transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand, >> leaving the package as it is is doing no harm besides the policy >> violation that has been in p

Re: Do we want to change libxml2's package name

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Mike Hommey wrote: > I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change, introducing a > transitional package, shouldn't be disruptive. On the other hand, > leaving the package as it is is doing no harm besides the policy > violation that has been in place for almost a decade. >

Do we want to change libxml2's package name

Hi, While going through the list of bugs for libxml2, I was wondering what to do with #142172, which I tagged wontfix almost 6 years ago, when I became libxml2 maintainer, because of the status quo between the reporter and the previous maintainer. I am now wondering what to do. Doing the change,