Hi Jörg,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:51:26PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> > additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> > unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> > de
On 12750 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refu
Philipp Kern (08/02/2012):
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:30:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> > additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it
> > is unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:30:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> decision for the UDD
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> > > there is any chance to i
On 12749 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> files from Squeeze (and Wheezy).
Learn to read: In the last mails, cited many times, my sql query, the result.
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> > files from Squeeze (and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> files from Squeeze (and Wheezy).
>
It seems extremely unlikely to get any change like that
[Trying to reach SRM via this list. To get the history of this thread
please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/02/msg9.html ]
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:44:49PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> >> You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are
> >> all whe
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:07:07 +
with message-id <1326643627.29770.94.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#647658: Description-less packages file
has caused the Debian Bug report #647658,
regarding Description-less packages file
to be marked a
Le 14/11/2011 02:20, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without
the English description embedded inside them. Instead they are now
written into a new file, the "English Translat
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
>I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without
>the English description embedded inside them. Instead they are now
>written into a new file, the "English Translation" file in
>"main/i18n/Translation-en.bz2".
Hey,
* Joerg Jaspert [2011-11-03 22:39:02 CET]:
> I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without
> the English description embedded inside them. Instead they are now
> written into a new file, the "English Translation" file in
> "main/i18n/Translation-en.bz2". They thu
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:39 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without
> the English description embedded inside them. Instead they are now
> writt
Hello world,
I don't know if I really got everyone who should have a copy of this
mail in my CC list, so please forward it to wherever you think I am
missing. Thanks.
I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without
the English description embedded inside them. Instead the
15 matches
Mail list logo
