On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:42:28PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I have problems with those:
>
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/memory_cs.o
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/ftl_cs.o
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/mo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> > pcmcia-cs
>
> OK, they're being uploaded right now.
I have problems with those:
depmod: *** Unresolved sym
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> > pcmcia-cs
>
> OK, they're being uploaded right now.
Ok, I'm building 2.2.20 i386 (binary only) with this ri
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
>
> Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> pcmcia-cs
OK, they're being uploaded right now.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:14:08PM +1100, herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> > pcmcia-cs
>
> OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then.
>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:14:24PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
>
> Yesterday evening (US MST) I tried building the modules a few more times
> and had joeyh test them, but they always had symbol issues I don't
> have gcc272 installed on my boxes, so I don't understand why the symbols
> don't m
Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > >
> > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> > > pcmcia-cs
> >
> > OK, I'll do that on
In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> >
> > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> > pcmcia-cs
>
> OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then.
>
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a special mantra I must chant to get one of them to produce these
> coveted packages? :)
We will have this done by end of day (midnight eastern) tomorrow come
hook or crook.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then it failed with a compilation error and Marcin Owsiany said:
> Again this is my fault :-(
> This is something I forgot about during integration of
> LANGUAGE_CHOOSER - the Makefile tries to build dbootstrap-lc
> even if USE_LANGUAGE_CHOOSER
Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ive see 2.2.20 appear now, shall I use that one? Last night I tried with a
> CVS checkout, might have worked, if my ftp sever hadn't gone away...
Wouldn't make a single bit of difference since the only change is the
Alpha kernel version.
--
Deb
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:49:15PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Did you do 'make check' ? Are you building with the language chooser
> > per chance? Odd. It shouldn't be running this stuff unless you're
> > building with the
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
>
> Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the
> pcmcia-cs
OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then.
The compiler change is due to the kgcc/gcc272 detection in 2.2.18pre.
> If it is possible for someone to build a new
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19
> with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia on
> i386/vanilla kernel, which may or may not be a release blocker in the
> release manager's eyes.
>
> Of course,
Ben Collins wrote:
> Is there a special mantra I must chant to get one of them to produce these
> coveted packages? :)
Probably like "Thanksgiving is over, get back to work" .. ;-)
--
see shy jo
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:08:19PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
> > > > problems on sparc.
> > >
> > > AFAIK ther
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ben Collins wrote:
> > > FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
> > > problems on sparc.
> >
> > AFAIK there are still pcmcia issues on i386. The pcmcia package doesn't
> > match t
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
> > problems on sparc.
>
> AFAIK there are still pcmcia issues on i386. The pcmcia package doesn't
> match the kernel or something and needs
Ben Collins wrote:
> FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
> problems on sparc.
AFAIK there are still pcmcia issues on i386. The pcmcia package doesn't
match the kernel or something and needs to be rebuilt.
--
see shy jo
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Did you do 'make check' ? Are you building with the language chooser
> per chance? Odd. It shouldn't be running this stuff unless you're
> building with the Language chooser (i18n) stuff.
FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-bui
Did you do 'make check' ? Are you building with the language chooser
per chance? Odd. It shouldn't be running this stuff unless you're
building with the Language chooser (i18n) stuff.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, lance wrote:
[...]
>You cant
> even download Debian 2.2r0 anymore and you certainly cant make iso images
> using the pseudo image kit because the original ftp files were overwritten
> by 2.2r1 on the mirrors, without the pseudo image kit having caught up,
> there doesnt s
boot-floppies 2.2.18 seem to have a missing build-depends on python-dev:
[...]
iconv -f `head -1 swedish.src | sed -e 's/^.*charset="\([^"]*\)".*/\1/' -t
utf-8 < swedish.src > swedish.xml
gcc -c -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -pipe
-I/usr/include/python1.5 iconv.c
iconv.c:22: Python
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:29:46AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If it is possible for someone to build a new
> > pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19
> > with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it is possible for someone to build a new
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.218pre21 I can possibly build boot-floppies 2.2.19
> with that tonight. If not, we're going to have broken pcmcia on
> i386/vanilla kernel, which may or may not be a release blocker in th
I just confirmed to my dismay that pcmcia for the vanilla (default)
kernel for boot-floppies 2.2.18 on i386 is broken. That means we need
to update pcmcia-modules-2.2.18pre21 for i386.
The real snag is that I'm out tonight (flying home) and then flying
off on vacation tomorrow morning. I will b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Collins writes:
>On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:28:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>> > > Since I'm being held responsible both for the current situation and for
>> > > resolving it, and since no o
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> > As a CD Vendor I have watched this thread with interest. The day that you
> > release 2.2R2 there could be a major security hole announced that needs
> > fixing. There could be another one the day I get the Cd's back from the
> > replicator !!
>
> But th
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> - Security updates affecting base packages, Wichert. How long till this
> is done? What packages should we be watching for?
New modutils (current security fix breaks some things in nasty ways),
libncurses (dan), elvis-tiny (uploaded, needs to be rebuild).
> - Res
> As a CD Vendor I have watched this thread with interest. The day that you
> release 2.2R2 there could be a major security hole announced that needs
> fixing. There could be another one the day I get the Cd's back from the
> replicator !!
But there are security issues we know about *now*. I'm not
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:35:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:53:49AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > So we release immediately even though there are major security updates and
> > > package revisions that need to be done? T
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:28:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So do we want to change that to "wait for 2.2r3" just after releasing
> > 2.2r2? IMO, if the securty fixes don't get it, there is no way we can
> > recommend CD vendors
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> So do we want to change that to "wait for 2.2r3" just after releasing
> 2.2r2? IMO, if the securty fixes don't get it, there is no way we can
> recommend CD vendors using 2.2r2.
2.2r2 will have security problems when released. Hopefull
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:35:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:53:49AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So we release immediately even though there are major security updates and
> > package revisions that need to be done? That sounds like RH release goals,
> > "make the p
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:53:49AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> So we release immediately even though there are major security updates and
> package revisions that need to be done? That sounds like RH release goals,
> "make the point change, just so it looks like we are doing something".
I repeat:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:01:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Some further notes, starting at the end:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > This looks like everything. I think we can probably get this completed in
> > less than two weeks (giving extra time becaus
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > - Update packages. This is in a per arch basis, and only if absolutely
> > essential (this applies to out-of-date packages only). You can update as
> > needed, but
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > [m68k] no 2.2.18 yet, maybe we will have a new set of 2.2.10 kernels, but
> >they should be tested a little by our users. We might build 2.2.16 or
> >17 kernels, but I think there is not enough time to test this.
>
> [m68k] no 2.2.18 yet, maybe we will have a new set of 2.2.10 kernels, but
>they should be tested a little by our users. We might build 2.2.16 or
>17 kernels, but I think there is not enough time to test this.
2.2.16 is known to not boot on a variety of Macs, please stick with 2.2
Some further notes, starting at the end:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> This looks like everything. I think we can probably get this completed in
> less than two weeks (giving extra time because of US holiday).
As announced (see the previous reference to debian-ann
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> - Update packages. This is in a per arch basis, and only if absolutely
> essential (this applies to out-of-date packages only). You can update as
> needed, but we wont hold back release for non-essential updates, it will
> just ha
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Here's the current status of 2.2r2 release plans, in order of expected
> completion, along with those responsible:
>
> - Kernel 2.2.18-pre21 builds (ports who want it). Let me know who wants
> this, and when you can get it done. If y
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Kernel 2.2.18-pre21 builds (ports who want it). Let me know who wants
> this, and when you can get it done. If you do not tell me that your port
> needs 2.2.18-pre21 kernel images, then we wont be waiting for it to be
> uploaded. Give me a time fra
Here's the current status of 2.2r2 release plans, in order of expected
completion, along with those responsible:
- Security updates affecting base packages, Wichert. How long till this
is done? What packages should we be watching for?
- Kernel 2.2.18-pre21 builds (ports who want it). Let me kno
44 matches
Mail list logo
