On 15/08/2012 15:34, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>
> the initial release of rush_1.7+dfsg-1 happened a year ago.
> The package has a minute user base, but when I returned to the
> package recently I happened to notice that there was a clear
> mistake in the recording of copyright terms for one of t
Hallo all,
the initial release of rush_1.7+dfsg-1 happened a year ago.
The package has a minute user base, but when I returned to the
package recently I happened to notice that there was a clear
mistake in the recording of copyright terms for one of the
files. The published package claims GPL, whe
2 matches
Mail list logo
