On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > OTOH, aren't most of these
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> > > habit ?
> >
> > OTOH
Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> > habit ?
>
> OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by
> habit?
The
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
*SKIP*
> OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> habit ?
OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by
habit?
--
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
--
To U
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> > rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> > would say that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/08 04:19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
>> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
Can either version of grub handle all the cases that lilo can? for
example can either of them handle the situation where root is on lvm and
there is no
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> would say that the activity on the bug report shows the same.
OTOH, aren't most of the
William Pitcock wrote:
> I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
> moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
That's just great. That means that whoever did this just broke an option
that's been available in Debian Installer since forever: to
9 matches
Mail list logo
