Re: Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

2016-07-16 Thread Afif Elghraoui
على السبت 16 تـمـوز 2016 ‫14:26، كتب Adam D. Barratt: > There are other reasons why the migration might not have occurred. The > excuse in question finishes with "valid candidate", indicating that this > is /not/ a blocker. Ok, I guess I expected the excuses page to have all the relevant informa

Re: Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

2016-07-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2016-07-16 at 13:52 -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > I had previously requested removal of outdated binaries for python-pysam > to enable testing migration, but I did not do so for mips64el because > the migration excuse[1] says: > > ~~~ > missing build on mips64el: python-pysam, python-pysa

Confusing migration excuse regarding mips64el

2016-07-16 Thread Afif Elghraoui
[please keep me in Cc] Hello, I had previously requested removal of outdated binaries for python-pysam to enable testing migration, but I did not do so for mips64el because the migration excuse[1] says: ~~~ missing build on mips64el: python-pysam, python-pysam-tests, python3-pysam (from 0.9.0+ds