Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:03:24PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > >> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > >> to do about it? Several people are claiming

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Ming Hua
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > > to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be > > rebuilt, and in that c

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what >> to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be >> rebuilt, and in that case it would need a pac

Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what > to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be > rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet > another painful lib

C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet another painful library transition. Obviously I don't want to do this unless absolutely