Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote... > > > I'd like to get a clear picture regarding the situation of building > > armel for buster on arm64, ideally moving it to arm64 hardwre soon. > > JFTR, I'd appreciate if armel/armhf could continue to be p

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/24/2018 08:43 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Perhaps just babble and FUD: There was (and probably still is) an issue > in powerpc: In a certain package, upstream's compile options for ppc had > higher CPU requirements than what Debian uses for that architecture. As > a result, the buildd (some

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Adrian Bunk wrote... > I'd like to get a clear picture regarding the situation of building > armel for buster on arm64, ideally moving it to arm64 hardwre soon. JFTR, I'd appreciate if armel/armhf could continue to be part of a release. > 1. What issues are considered possible problems for movi

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:22:36AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 07:27:15AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>... >> The next big problem I can see is in our haskell packages for >> armhf. From my build log for haskell-zxcvbn-c_1.0.1-4.log (as an >> example): >> >> ... >> Setting

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
ript subprocess returned error exit > status 132 > ... > > I'm going to have a look at that later today. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864847#15 > >3. Starting to build armel on arm64 > > > >Depending on the answers to the questions above

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
v5te) is low enough that several >of the issues with running armhf code on arm64 are not present >when running armel code on arm64. > >If anyone sees potential blockers for building armel on arm64, >especially ones that are not present for building armhf on arm64, >please speak up now

Building armel on arm64

2018-07-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
ecated in the next version of their architecture. The armel baseline (currently armv5te) is low enough that several of the issues with running armhf code on arm64 are not present when running armel code on arm64. If anyone sees potential blockers for building armel on arm64, especially ones that ar