Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #990956 [release.debian.org] uploading lintian-brush to
testing-proposed-updates
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
990956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jelmer,
On 21-07-2021 00:24, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Done, thanks. Hopefully this looks alright.
The diff of the package in tpu doesn't look like the one I ACKed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 990956 -moreinfo
Bug #990956 [release.debian.org] uploading lintian-brush to
testing-proposed-updates
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
990956: https://bugs.debian.org/
tags 990956 -moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:46:12PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 20-07-2021 00:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >> Still not promising anything, but what would be the proposed change in
> >> t-p-u?
> > Please find attached the proposed change. Please note that it only
> >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #990956 [release.debian.org] uploading lintian-brush to
testing-proposed-updates
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
990956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 20-07-2021 00:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Still not promising anything, but what would be the proposed change in
>> t-p-u?
> Please find attached the proposed change. Please note that it only
> affects the testsuite.
That last note was what I was hoping fo
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:25:29PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-07-2021 01:20, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >>> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the
Hi,
On 12-07-2021 01:20, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
>>> lintian-brush from testing.
>>
>> Can you elaborate why i
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Jelmer,
>
> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
> > lintian-brush from testing.
>
> Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, b
Hi Jelmer,
On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
> lintian-brush from testing.
Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, but there
could be reasons for t-p-u)? The current autoremoval is scheduled
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 08:35:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 11-07-2021 19:44, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Can I upload a small fix for lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to
> > allow
> > it to remain in testing? I just found out an old FTBFS bug is still
> > affecting
> > it
Hi Jelmer,
On 11-07-2021 19:44, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Can I upload a small fix for lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to
> allow
> it to remain in testing? I just found out an old FTBFS bug is still affecting
> it in testing, and there's a much newer version in unstable.
That's not why
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi release team,
Can I upload a small fix for lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to allow
it to remain in testing? I just found out an old FTBFS bug is still affecting
it in testing, and there's a much newer version in unstable.
The bug in q
13 matches
Mail list logo
